Friday, October 14, 2011

Does this Make My Butt Look Big? (And do you want it to?)



BIG or SMALL? Mixed Messages and the Ideal Body


I hear people say “my butt is too big. I want it to be smaller” and I hear the same number of people say the opposite “my butt is too small. I want it to be bigger.” The media seems to be filled with mixed messages about the way female bodies should look like. Magazine articles that espouse workout tips alternately switch from topics of how to make ones big butt disappear to how to make one’s butt look bigger. One such article from Women’s Health Magazine is titled “4 Moves to Boost your butt” another from the website Real Women’s Fitness has an article called “Lose that Fat Butt.” How can these two seemingly opposite goals of body appearance be in existence at the same time in our culture?

The difference here may be the qualifying word “fat.” It’s alright to have a large, curvy butt, as long as it’s not fat that stored up in your rump. I’ll use an example of two celebrities, Kim Kardashian and Jennifer Love Hewitt, to illustrate my point.


Kardashian is known to the public primarily for her curves, and by that I mean that she is known for having a large ass. Hewitt has been a famous actress for a longer time than Kardashian, with her fame starting from the age of adolescence with TV and movie appearances. For most of her career Hewitt has appeared to be very skinny. However in 2007, Hewitt gained a few extra pounds. When pictures were released of Hewitt frolicking on the beach the media caused a fire storm by calling her “fat.”

Comparing her picture with Kardashian’s however, I see little difference. Hewitt responded to the criticism by saying that still wore “size 2” clothing. So if these two girls weigh and look relatively the same size why was Hewitt’s body shamed?

Jennifer Love Hewitt, Kim Kardashian


We are supposed toadmire the “curves” of Kim Kardashian. But then criticize like Jennifer Love Hewitt who has hips and a big butt? At first, if one thinks these two women areroughly the same body weight, then the treatment to Hewitt and dismissal of Kardashianseems unfair. But I think the reason Hewitt was attacked was because she wasseen as being unnaturally overweight. In previous years Hewitt had alwaysappeared smaller and leaner. Therefore the conclusion was made that she startedeating more and exercising less and that is the reason why she got bigger. “Tobecome fat” as Farrell suggests, “meant that one had moved down –had degraded –on the scale of civilization,” (64). However, for the entirety of Kardashian’s fame she has stayed the same size and thus has not declined on the civilization spectrum.


Are there even someracial components at play here? Kim Kardashian, with her dark features andAlbanian ancestry, is considered, in comparison to white Jennifer Love Hewitt, tobe “ethnic.” So do we expect Kardashian, as being a representative of “ethnic”or “exotic” physique to be larger than white Americans?

Whatever the underlyingreasons, the different reactions people have to different people’s bodies are sending out mixed messages. Some people are praised for their big backsides whileothers fall victim to harsh comments and scorn. Is there a happy medium groundwhere a person can have the “right” amount of weight stored in the behind?



But why does a desire to have a curvy butt exist at the same time the desire to be small and lean exist? Farrell suggests that this has always been the case.“the connotation of fat as female, primitive,and sexual has often evoked a mixture of attraction and repulsion….The popularity of the bustle in women’s fashion in the second half of the 19th century is a prime example of this attraction and repulsion. The bustle can be seen as a false ‘steatopypia,’ an artifice that creates an excessive protuberance of the buttocks. On the other hand… it was a false set of buttocks that was fashionable, an allusion to the shape of the iconic Venus Hottenhot but not an actual development of real fleshy buttocks.” (Fat Shame p. 74. Emphasis added.)

This is extremely obvious when the image of the “Venus Hottentot” and a image of a woman wearing a bustle are placed side by side.
Venus Hottenhot , 19th century bustle style dress



Strikingly similar to the 19th century bustle are contemporary products made to enhance booty size.

Bustle worn under female dress, Deluxe Hip and Padded Panty by Feel Foxy




There is an entire website called Feel Foxy that is dedicated to selling various products all designed to make the butt look bigger. There are padded panties, hip booster padded panty, formed hip enhancer, and many, many, more butt enhancement clothing articles. Feel Foxy’s products have been featured on the daytime televisions Today, Tyra Banks, and Rachael Ray shows, and also on the “medically focused” (as the titles of their programs suggests at least) Dr. Oz and The Doctors.

Perhaps people naturally want to have a Hottentot like body. Likely, people want to avoid the negative connotations that come along with having a big bottom: that you are primitive, lazy, and out of control. Yet, the image of a rounder backside is appealing so maybe there are ways to gain that aesthetic without actually getting fat. The bustle and the padded underwear are things that can just as easily be taken off as put on. When one slips off the undergarment meant to produce the image of a larger posterior they are also able to shed the negative connotations associated with having a naturally large behind.





The question is: how does society want our behinds to look like? Does it want them to be large or small? Moreover, is there any way a person can ever reach society’s standard of beauty? For me, it seems to be a no win situation. And maybe it is purposefully unattainable. Without magazines telling us what to do to make our butts look good, and without products specifically designed to make our butts look good, how would those companies make money?




Links:

http://realwomensfitness.com/lower-body-exercises/lose-that-fat-butt/
http://www.womenshealthmag.com/fitness/butt-shaping-exercises
http://www.feelfoxy.com/default.asp

6 comments:

  1. I definitely believe this divide is cultural. You mentioned Kardashian as representing "exotic" women, with curves for days and an ass worth writing home about--but perhaps those appreciative of her ass come from a society/culture where big butts are attractive.

    Sir Mix-a-Lot didn't write a song about asses for nothing. In fact, he makes it seem as if it's a black/spanish/not-white kind of thing, especially in the line "Even white boys gotta shout, baby got back". He even tells ladies to work out, as long as they don't lose that butt, so he must be aware of the pressure to lose weight too!

    Anyway, I think it depends whose society we listen to. In many communities and "counter-cultures" big butts are desired, but I wonder how difficult it would be to move between this divide, between cultures/classes/etc... My ass has never worried me more. lol

    ReplyDelete
  2. It's a shame that Jennifer Love Hewitt's defense against the media firestorm raging around her body was: "I still wear size 2." Her statement reminds me of the suffragist tactic of handling criticism, instead of defending the fat woman's body they played right into the degrading, dehumanizing stereotypes. In a similar way, Hewitt could have taken this opportunity to express a pride in her body, but instead she fell back on the societal standards of beauty. By saying that she still wears a "size 2" she implies that anything above that number, that category is out of control and is fat. And yes, being a size two is by no means fat when the majority of American women are sized as 14. So, no Jennifer Love Hewitt isn't fat but then if the average American woman is considered "plus size" is she really fat?
    As for the middle ground you write of, the so-called "right amount of weight stored in the behind" really cannot be defined. There are so many unique bodies on this planet that there really can never be a singular "right" number. "Right" would be what is right for the individual. Both Jennifer Love Hewitt and Kim Kardashian are in the right.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Vicki,

    I find it very difficult to separate out different cultures. That is not to say that there are not subcultures in America, but I would argue that the dominant culture seems to pull from a variety of cultures, often producing contradictory results (ex: big butt/small butt). I think this comes from the fact that American citizens are so diverse in their ethnic, racial, and social backgrounds. All the different opinions seem to get mixed together. Great for promoting individuality and diversity! Confusing for young people trying to conform to standards. Therefore, I think it would be hard to move in and out of different cultures. Trying to hold the two opposite views in my mind gives me a headache.




    Ava,

    I completely agree with you about Jennifer Love Hewitt. At the time I felt like she handled the situation well by saying she wasn't "fat." But after reading Fat Shame I've come to think differently. Why would it be bad if you were fat, Jennifer? Obviously, the media's comments were negative and mean but that's because they were supposed to be. She could have turned their argument for the criticism around on them and asked "why is it bad to be fat?"
    That being said, I personally feel that if someone were to call me fat I would immediately retaliate by saying "but I'm a size 4." Maybe later after some contemplation I would have an epiphany and then ask my fat accusers what's so wrong with being fat, but like I said, that probably wouldn't be my initial reaction. Being called "fat" hurts. Farrell tells us it shouldn't and I agree....but I'm not sure that conviction has completely supplanted all the ingrained negative connotations the word "fat" has represented to me, and to my culture, my entire life.

    ReplyDelete
  4. I think part of the padded underwear trend is that instead of having a real large butt, one can simply take it off. For example, if someone goes out in tight jeans, they may want to accent their butt or make it look bigger. On the other hand, when they wear a bathing suit, they don't want to be falling out of it. It's sort of like a push up bra for the butt. Why does it seem that women are never satisfied with their breast size? Is it because they think men just want to look at better boobs? maybe a better butt? I think the artificial enhancement of curves has only one target to capture: the attention of men.

    ReplyDelete
  5. Kim,

    Going off of what you said about the padded underwear and padded bras I think it's interesting to note how clothing styles are manufactured. Take jeans. A recent popular jean style has been the low riding jeans. I don't think low rise pants aren't that flattering to those with naturally bigger butts. I identify as having curvy hips/butt and I have a difficult time finding pants/jeans that fit me. From my perspective, it seems that clothing is designed primarily for skinny people with flat butts. I also have friends who are large chested and say they have trouble finding shirts and dresses that fit or flatter them. I think all of this might relate to what you said about being naturally more padded versus artificially padded. There are clothing articles (bras, panties, etc.) to help enhance certain features (butt and chest) that they don't expect you to naturally have.

    ReplyDelete
  6. I remember watching the Kardashians and wondering how Kim was able to get away in the media without being called "fat" because of her curves. While I don't see her body as fat at all, in fact I think it's great that someone has the courage in Hollywood to display something besides a stick-thin supermodel body, but I realize also that Hollywood has a tendency to really belittle and hate, really, women whose bodies do not fit into the stereotypical movie star body. I never, in all my wondering, even thought about the fact that perhaps Kardashian's curves are accepted because of her background. It blows my mind to think that perhaps this is some of the reason (if not all) of why she has been allowed to maintain a bigger body while still working in Hollywood (if that's what you would call the working sphere for reality show stars.) It is completely ridiculous that in 2011 we are still carrying forth the same stigmas of the 19th century!

    ReplyDelete